像拼零件,不像写巨型 prompt
每个 skill 先拆成小原子节点,再决定串行、并行、替换和缓存,不靠一个大 prompt 撑全场。
Free Product
它不是工作流平台,也不是全自动大脑。它是一个低 token 成本的 skill 组合器,让你先把 skill 拆小,再按规则拼成可执行流程。
Why now
每个 skill 先拆成小原子节点,再决定串行、并行、替换和缓存,不靠一个大 prompt 撑全场。
先给出步骤结构和 token 预算,再决定要不要真的跑,这比先烧 token 再后悔经济得多。
CLI 输出支持 JSON 和 Markdown,两种形态都围绕同一套命令:compose / estimate / explain。
CLI surface
compose
Generate the composed workflow plan with step order, validation checks, and cacheable stages.
estimate
Estimate total token budget and show which steps drive cost.
explain
Explain why steps are ordered this way and what can be replaced or cached.
Manifest examples
A narrow serial flow for intake -> research squeeze -> final brief generation.
3 steps · /examples/skill-glue/serial.json
A mixed serial + parallel flow that prepares hooks and evidence separately before assembly.
4 steps · /examples/skill-glue/parallel.json
A flow that can swap a heavy planner for a lighter planner depending on branch count.
4 steps · /examples/skill-glue/replaceable.json
Sample output
{
"id": "parallel-content-stack",
"execution_order": [
["topic.intake"],
["hook.builder", "evidence.bundle"],
["assembly.pass"]
],
"estimated_cost": {
"total_score": 5,
"budget_band": "low"
},
"cacheable_steps": ["topic.intake", "hook.builder", "evidence.bundle"]
}Source & proof
Before / After
Before:把选题、研究、hooks、整合全塞进一个巨型 prompt,结果 token 消耗高、输出不稳、每次改一点都要整体重跑。
After:拆成 intake、hook builder、evidence bundle、assembly pass 四个节点,能并行的并行,能缓存的缓存,解释和估算都更清楚。
它最适合那些已经知道大 prompt 越来越贵,但还没把 workflow 结构显式化的任务。
Next step